“It will take a lot of research, and a lot of time, but there are also a lot of commercial applications, not just military applications,” he said.

The idea of communicating by thought alone is not a new one. In the 1960s, a researcher strapped an EEG to his head and, with some training, could stop and start his brain’s alpha waves to compose Morse code messages.

The Army grant to researchers at University of California, Irvine, Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Maryland has two objectives. The first is to compose a message using, as D’Zmura puts it, “that little voice in your head.”

The second part is to send that message to a particular individual or object (like a radio), also just with the power of thought. Once the message reaches the recipient, it could be read as text or as a voice mail.

While the money may come from the Army and its first use could be for covert operations, D’Zmura thinks that thought-based communication will find more use in the civilian realm.

“The eventual application I see is for students sitting in the back of the lecture hall not paying attention because they are texting,” said D’Zmura. “Instead, students could be back there, just thinking to each other.”

EEG-based gaming devices are large and fairly conspicuous, but D’Zmura thinks that eventually they could be incorporated into a baseball hat or a hood.

Another use for such a system is for patients with Lou Gehrig’s disease, or ALS. As the disease progresses, patients have fully functional brains but slowly lose control over their muscles. Synthetic telepathy could be a way for these patients to communicate.

One of the first areas for thought-based communication is in the gaming world, said Paul Sajda of Columbia University.

Commercial EEG headsets already exist that allow wearers to manipulate virtual objects by thought alone, noted Sajda, but thinking “move rock” is easier than, say, “Have everyone meet at Starbucks at 5:30.”

One difficulty in composing specific messages is fundamental — EEGs are not very specific. They can only locate a signal to within about one to two centimeters. That’s a large distance in the brain. In the brain’s auditory cortex, for example, two centimeters is the difference between low notes and high notes, D’Zmura said.

https://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2008/04/can-soldiers-be/

Placing electrodes between the skull and the brain would offer more precise readings, but it is expensive and requires invasive surgery.

To work around this problem, the scientists need to gain a much better understanding of what words and phrases light up what brain sections. To create a detailed map of the brain scientists will also use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Each technology has its own strengths and weaknesses. EEGs detect brain activity only on the outer bulges of the brain’s folds. MEGs read brain activity on the inner folds but are too large to put on your head. FMRIs detect brain activity more accurately than either but are heavy and expensive.

Most human rights organizations, healthcare personnel, politicians and lawmakers seem to be unaware of what types of HE that are in operation. Even fewer know how to handle it and what it means to their respective profession. A broader investigation is needed to reveal the consequences for the victims and society in general.

UN Commission of Human Rights, Interpol, EU Commission of Ethics
Martial law should be issued in EU.

This letter is a test of international collaboration against invisible war between human brains, via bioelectronics and the new networking technology, a war that has already been going on for five years, 24 hours a day.

A civilian/military research is creating an invisible war in the minds and brains of the civilian population, while constructing an artificial intelligence.

Brain Implants and miniaturized Signal Analysis System is implanted in people without their informed consent, in hospitals all over Europe. The systems are used to clone, and make an artificial copy of the human life, including their nervous system, memory, learning and emotions. This type of illegal research of are impossible to detect. This crimes can continue because yet there is no technology that can detect bioelectronics/neuroelectronics in nano size.

The artificial intelligence which performs the majority of the research work, is programmed as a war machine that does not hesitate from any means in order to improve its learning and cloning of a human. This intelligence acquire continuously, more and more unreasonable arguments for continuing its work to grow, including the use of gross physical and mental abuse in an attempt to  uphold ”companionship” with the person who is under intrusion. This is also a war between humans and the new computer brains.

The government say it does not have any information about this topic. That mean they can’t secure the civilian population and the entire medical community is misled. Because of this, Minister of Justice, Beatrice Ask, and Minister of Social, Göran Hägglund, ought to be questioned before a court martial, under oath be forced to acknowledge their eventually knowledge about the use of  these technologies.

Martin Ingvar and the management of FOI and KTH should also be court-martialed and forced to reveal the interdisciplinary neuroscience research progress in these fields.

Research progress has by now been used for human persecution, torture and aggravated assault during the last six years.

All of this human slaughter must be revealed; the hidden number of on-line connected people and their abuse is unknown and must be investigated. Any collaboration with the U.S. in this matter must be visualized.

This miniaturized invisible war, directly into people’s brains, can be compared directly with what America’s soldiers performed during many wars.
Just as soldiers looting, burning of villages, raping women and children, many Swedish families are now being exposed in the same way of this vandalism, the difference is that the new war is invisible and contained within their brains.

The effects of the violence being carried out around the clock is that the subjects are unable to work. The effects after years of copying is that the subjects families, life’s work, wealth, and social life is ruined. Many of the people being abused by this science are family providers with children.

Is it ethical to allow the multidisciplinary research in brain-computer interface and broadband technologies? Is it ethical to allow civilian-military cartel, with private interests in companies and software, to destroy innocent people just to further develop this technology?
Lawmakers in congress raise their eyebrows when bills to mature HUMAN EXPERIMENT competency in new areas have led them into a series of unrealistic price and schedule proposal. However, tailoring the requirements and shooting for a less rigorous capability demonstration could also convince lawmakers to follow intelligence needs.

Of all three technologies EEG is the one currently cheap enough, light enough and fast enough for a mass market device.

The map generated by all three technologies will help the computer guess which word of phrase a person means when a part of the brain is lights up on the EEG. The idea is similar to how dictation software like Dragon NaturallySpeaking uses context to help determine which word you said.

Mapping the brain’s response to most of the English language is a large task, and D’Zmura says that it will be 15-20 years before thought-based communication is reality. Sajda, who is on sabbatical in Japan to research using EEGs to scan images rapidly, sounded skeptical but excited.

“There are technical hurdles that need to be ovecome first, but then again, 20 years ago people would have thought that the two of us talking to each other half a world away over Skype (and Internet-based phone service) was crazy,” said Sajda.

To those who might be nervous about thought-based communication turning into a sci-fi comedy of errors, D’Zmura says not to worry. Mind-message composition would take specific conscious thoughts and training to develop them. The device would also have a on/off switch.

“When I was a kid I occasionally said things that were inappropriate, and I learned not to do that,” said D’Zmura. “I think that people would learn to think in a way the computer couldn’t interpret. Or they can just switch it off.”